colors that go with your skin tone, subtle red highlights,Remy Human Hair,Weft Hair Extensions, Weave Hair Extensions, Human Hair Weave, Human Hair Extensions,,
And The Rich Just Keep
Rich people continually get richer while poor people get poorer, and the middle-class maintains an awkwardly imbalanced posture on an economic precipice. It is a general fact of everyday life in corrupt economic systems powered by, yet, more corrupt sets of laws determining who actually gets rich, and the way they go about doing it. When, for example, paper currency is represented by the ruling powers of a political regime as worth 100-percent of a basic monetary unit, akin to an American dollar, and there exists a quantity of precious metal, corresponding to gold or silver, backing-up those pieces of paper with one-dollar, ten-dollar, or 100-dollar amounts of that metal, there is not any way that the particular specie of paper currency may, at any time, be worth lower than the pre-determined set value. That is the one proper way through which a viable economic system is born and maintained. When there isn’t any precious metal standard supporting paper currency, similar to what presently exists under the constraints of the Federal Reserve System, an ordinary piece of paper (a Federal Reserve Note), only said to represent a specific value, may easily be manipulated, by the system that prints and circulates it, to have an actual worth of only a fraction of its purported illusionary value.
If, perchance, one-thousand people choose to come back together to form a new social compact, and with it a brand new government, and to collectively bring with them five-hundred-thousand pounds of gold, from which they would form fifty-million coins of various denominations worth one-dollar, five-dollars, ten-dollars, and so-on, the value set, for example, on a loaf of bread, a gallon of milk, or a liter of gasoline (products produced by the one-thousand citizens of the new state) would not be subject to inflationary price fluctuation. That is, unless abject greed, and usury, would enter into the equation. Invariably, whenever a brand new government is formed, the economy that follows directly reflects the ultimate purpose of the federal government, and the laws legislated by it, that are to, either, serve to learn only the few wealthy of that particular society, or the greater number of its common citizens.
In previous essays, “Economics and the Hershey Bar,” and “Simple Statistics Showing the Inequities of Capitalism,” the ultimately pragmatic purpose of labor, because the backbone of capitalistic corporate wealth, was underscored. Most people who end-up populating a brand new state are individuals who have not many capital resources and investment potential. We may say with historical accuracy that the great majority of the rank-and-file individuals who actually took-up arms and fought in the American Revolution, to free the thirteen-original British colonies from British monarchial rule and to form a brand new nation, were poor struggling men who wanted the opportunity and liberty to create, and maintain, an enjoyable and satisfactory lifestyle for his or subtle red highlights her families, and families-to-be. After the revolution, aggressively implemented designs for mercantilism and capitalism were deployed successfully by the one-to-two-percent of the new national population who were wealthy and had capital resources, and from such efforts a national workforce was formed. That was the beginning of the meteoric rise of capitalism in the brand new United States. Very soon, partnerships, corporations, companies, and syndicates were abounding, which churned out, over time, products, both luxury items and people desperately needed by the population of a fledgling nation-state. Those successful business organizations were originally created by a only a few wealthy capitalists and employed the struggling men, women, and youngsters who were unable, themselves, to make and sell products, and who depended upon their small meager salaries for their existences.
The basic notion underlying capitalism then, and now, was that the individual capitalist, who has the money and resources to create a business enterprise, should, by natural law, reap the best benefit from the results of his investments, even if the production, distribution, and sale of the products depends, in greatest part, upon the skilled labor of the staff hired by the capitalist to do the job.
Realistically, the possibility that one-thousand ordinary, poor-to-middle-class individuals, seeking to form a nation, would possess enough gold or silver, collectively, to constitute the quantity needed to create a monetary gold-based economy, may be very slim. Much truer can be the realization that, nearly always, only a very few wealthy individuals among the many of the hoi polloi usually fund a revolutionary movement, and the evolution of a new state. Hence, the capitalistic motives of acquiring future profit from investment, and reinvestment, are the standard impetus behind the formation of any new regime. So, though supposedly accountable for an experiment in democratic government, the very wealthy men who designed and ratified the U.S. Constitution, and christened the ensuing political economy, were hedonistically narcissistic enough to ensure that features were installed in the federal government, and laws legislated, which would be certain that their wealth could be protected, maintained, and perpetuated over time, and that financial control of the new nation would remain under the control of the very opulent. They weren’t about to lose their riches to a voluntary redistribution of national wealth under the auspices of a practical constitutional mandate of “socialistically promoting the overall welfare.” As President Herbert Hoover supposedly quipped once, off-the-record in 1930, “Why should I care more in regards to the plight of a hundred-thousand struggling families than the machineries of industry ” Moreover, by multiplying one-thousand ordinary, poor-to-middle-class citizens by 300,000, the product would yield the present approximate population of the United States, developed since 1776. Unfortunately, in such a large demographically heterogeneous immigrant population, the probabilities for unanimity, almost assured with a homogeneous population of 1-thousand, about the most effective type political economy for the best variety of U.S. citizens can be very slim. Therefore, such a demographic diversity would serve well an organized group of the wealthy elite, and their on-going, government-based, plan for retaining financial control over the economy, in an effort to take care of a desired status-quo. This was, and is, the Federal Reserve System that, at the side of the federal income tax and its collection agent, the interior Revenue Service, has reduced the U.S. economy to a vegetative inflationary state of affairs.
In such a plutocracy, why would a specific product, worth a certain amount of cash based upon the price of its ingredients or parts, maintain a standard price for twenty-years and then suddenly increase in price fifteen-hundred-percent in only five short years, when the product has not changed in substance, or basic value, at all That is, essentially, what has gradually happened in the United States since the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913 and Federal Reserve Notes eventually replaced silver certificates because the circulating currency, or legal tender. Taking it to the current day, not that many Americans actually understand how the Federal Reserve has been surreptitiously fashioned to work. In actual fact, only a few of them care in regards to the legality and constitutionality of the present system so long as “some” system is intact. So long as they’ve a medium of exchange, even if it is not really well worth the paper on which it’s printed, to us to buy and sell commodities and products, they do not seem to essentially give a hoot.
In a big nutshell, the United States Government abandoned the mandate of the U.S. Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, in the year 1913, by using the illicit precedent set by a politically motivated U.S. Supreme Court within the 1819 ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland. In that exact constitutional clause called the “necessary and proper clause, the dictionary definition of the word “necessary” was altered by nine very wealthy justices, supposedly schooled in the English language, who certainly knew that the word “necessary” meant utterly essential instead of politically convenient. You see, the relative size of the federal government and the degree of its rule over the American people are directly determined in accordance with the laws that are passed so as to execute the particular legislative congressional powers in Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. Most the Framers, who grew-up, and suffered, under the austere dominion of British monarchy, believed that a federal government was best that governed least. So, in clause 17 the mandate was agreed-upon to read, “Congress shall have power to make all laws which shall be “necessary and proper” for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the federal government of the United States, or in any department of officer thereof.”
Certainly, it doesn’t take a lawyer, or a doctor of English, to interpret the meaning set-forth in this foregoing clause, according to straightforward and accepted definition of the words. Nonetheless, there was a man, Alexander Hamilton, a monarchist, who grew-up in decadent opulence in the British West Indies, who, supposedly, was a Patriot and a writer of the U.S. Constitution. He was certainly one of three, including James Madison and John Jay, who wrote the “Federalist Papers” in an effort to advertise the brand new text of the U.S. Constitution among the many states. Hamilton, and certain other wealthy monarchists, wanted to see a national bank established, and controlled by the Executive Branch, with a view to regulate the value of American money.
Thomas Jefferson, then again, thought this was flagrantly unconstitutional in the face of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, because a national bank was not utterly essential to the congressional role of coining money and determining its value. Jefferson had insisted that clause 17 was placed into Article 1 expressly to prevent unnecessary laws from being passed and the unconstitutional proliferation of the federal government’s power over the states. Hamilton’s documented Machiavellian manipulation over the less-than-scholarly President George Washington, a splendid soldier and farmer, but hardly erudite, prevailed over Jefferson’s attempts to sway him from signing the primary National Bank Act into law.
After the primary National Bank, the express image of the Central British Bank, was established, there was a direct try to judicially declare the bank unconstitutional. This led to the tragically political Supreme Court ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, in 1819, which set an illicit precedent as to the “practical definition” of the word “necessary,” which turned out to be connoted as “politically convenient” instead of utterly essential, the accepted dictionary definition. And this was how Franklin D. Roosevelt was capable of triple the scale of the federal government, from 1936-on, through his New Deal being ruled as constitutional by the Supreme Court justices he picked to replace those who had previously declared his alphabet soup bureaucracy unconstitutional three times. According to accurate history, President Andrew Jackson, throughout the 1820s, was, like Thomas Jefferson, also convinced that the National Bank, the predecessor of the Federal Reserve System, was unconstitutional and twice-refused to renew its charter. This angered quite a few wealthy politicians and resulted within the unfortunate slandering of a fantastic American President who humbly chose to accept the wisdom of the poor-and-middle-class over the decadent whims of the wealthy elite.
Without the actual consent of the governed, the Federal Reserve System has been used to line the pocketbooks of a very small percentage of continually wealthy individuals, and is today the essential reason why small candy bars, worth, and sold for, 5-cents in 1965, are now sold for nearly one-dollar. And, much more surprising, American citizens are eagerly buying without even considering why they’re so expensive. The ingredients, and intrinsic value, of a mere candy bar has not changed because it was first sold for 3-cents in 1940. What has changed is the basic value of the American dollar. In 1912, the dollar was worth 90-percent of one-dollar, when it comes to silver and gold coinage. In 1965, the dollar was worth 78-percent, and gradually the Federal Reserve began replacing denominational silver certificates with Federal Reserve notes until all silver certificates were taken from circulation. With silver certificates, the citizen could go to any U.S. bank and demand the actual amount of silver, printed on the paper certificate denomination, in dimes, quarters, half-dollars, and silver dollars. Conversely, any Federal Reserve note was, and presently is, worth only what the interest rate set by the Federal Reserve Board determines as a transient value. You see, the Federal Reserve Board is solely owned and operated by private bankers and financiers. Fedex is, actually, just as, or more, federal than the Federal Reserve Board. Outrageously, the FED sells the notes it produces to the U.S. Government with a usurious interest rate attached. That is the interest rate that the FED raises-and-lowers in line with the transient value it wants the U.S. dollar to convey. Because of this the U.S. dollar is currently worth less than 15-percent of the near-100-percent value it had under the gold and silver standard.
When a lot of the silver certificates, which were placed into U.S. circulation from 1900 until around 1976, were removed throughout the United States, the minting of silver coins was stopped and coins, fabricated from much-lower than precious metal, were produced and circulated. These coins, most of which have been in circulation because the early 1980s, resemble the valuable silver coins, but are intrinsically worthless. At this moment in history, credit, the economic abomination of abominations, became a really pragmatic means to a consuming end. The “American Express,” “Visa,” and “Mastercard” were introduced because the preeminent means by which to buy cars, furniture, and other luxuries. Mortgages, home loans, car loans, educational loans, and business loans, based on arbitrary collateral, had already been in existence since the late 1800s. On the time of the good Depression, Henry Ford had already introduced a means for poor-and-middle class Americans to easily purchase automobiles, dubbed installment buying within the early 1920s. It was hyped by the accepted financial geniuses of that era as the “only” best way to purchase a car. Pay a certain amount of cash down, and the rest in regular monthly payments, with a purpose to own the Model “T” Ford of your dreams. This was the advertising propaganda that led to the sale of over two-million Ford autos within six-years time. If the common American family-man had a job, in 1926, earning 200-dollars per week, and owned a house with a 50-dollar-per-month mortgage, you could almost wager that he also was paying 35-55-dollars per 30 days for his home furnishings and, probably, 60-dollars-per-month for a 2,000-dollar car. If you add-up the monthly payments, plus interest, paid-out by this person, it is kind of apparent that that individual did not really “own” anything outright. His creditors actually “owned” all of his possessions until the time he had finally paid what he owed for them. Waking-up one morning and suddenly realizing you didn’t really own anything that you possessed probably put a brand new meaning on “living within your means.” This sad fact made the hardworking individual totally dependent upon his job salary for the cash to pay his creditors. Therefore, when you think about that less than 3-percent of all of people that bought Model “T” Fords were able to purchase them out-right, with cash, there was quite a little bit of credit paper floating around the country within the late 1920s, with none money with which to back-it-up. So, when the crap proverbially hit the fan on Black Friday, in 1929, and 16-percent of the population suddenly became unemployed, a lot of the middle-class and lower-middle-class lost everything that they possessed, not owned.
How does this apply to the current day, late-2008, financial crisis within the United subtle red highlights States Well, it was once, before 1970, that saving money was a much more thrifty, and sensible, thing to do than spending money unnecessarily and living beyond one’s means. It was that you only, by necessity, went into debt for, perhaps, two things, a car and a house. But that changed quite radically when the American dollar became much like the currently circulated Chinese “floating” Yuan, which is systematically raised and lowered in value in line with what the government deems as necessary. It has no basic intrinsic value in such an arbitrary Chinese political economy. Hence, when the Federal Reserve Board of Governors began to arbitrarily raise the interest rate on the amount of American money owed by the United States Government to the central Federal Reserve Bank, for the printing and circulating of Federal Reserve Notes around the nation, the one means of supporting an unsupportable debased economy was through the maintenance of a continuous spending cycle that depended mainly on credit. Because the interest rate was raised, the value of the dollar went down, lower-and-lower, until the present value of an American dollar, which is lower than 15-percent of the amount it was in 1950. Therefore, the housing market and their financiers, the large banking systems, began to feel the effect of severe unemployment and ballooning unsupported credit. I seem to recall the emphasis placed by the federal government on capricious spending, when those illusionary 2007 tax rebate checks were sent out. The Federal Reserve Board was desperately hoping that almost all Americans would immediately spend their small pittances, received from the government, to amass more debt through credit. Now, outrageously, the Federal Reserve Board wants the federal government to spend 700-billion dollars of tax money to bail-out the filthy rich, the 2-percent of the people and corporations who have control of 98-percent of the usable money and capital, in order to perpetuate an unsupportable economic system, doomed to fail overtime.
Some representatives and senators in Congress are presently wringing their hands, wondering what to do about the present financial crisis. These are the ones who know what to do, but are afraid to do it. They certainly realize that the fate of the U.S. Constitution hinges on their collective realization that Congress has the only authorized power to coin money and determine its value. The Federal Reserve Board, as a basically unconstitutional entity is wholly chargeable for devaluing the American dollar and creating the inflationary crisis that has gradually, over time, culminated in gripping the nation. Robert Samuelson said it well, partially, in one of his “Washington Post” editorials when he quipped, “The FED creates inflation, and the FED can control inflation.” The correct part is that the FED creates inflation. It is manufactured in abundance much like sorely defective engine parts. The insidiously false a part of his statement is that the FED cannot control the inflation that’s inherently part of the Federal Reserve System. It just keeps getting worse and worse. The one answer is, as Rep. Ron Paul so emphatically declares, to abolish the Federal Reserve System and reinstitute a gold and silver standard into the American economy. You can’t heal a festering infected sore by putting a loose dirty band aid on it. It’s going to continue to become increasingly infected until it finally must be severed from the body. The 700 billion dollar “bailout plan” is such a band aid.
The Constitution of the United States was expressly intended to advertise the overall welfare of all of the Americanpeople through the provisions contained within it. The wisdom of the Framers, though somewhat skewed resulting from a legal promotion of capitalism for the wealthy, was shown by their very basic drive to erect an economy based upon a gold standard. A democratic socialist state economy would, also, be best predicated on a gold standard regulated and controlled by the legislative branch of government. But “any” government of the those that places the fate of its public finances within the hands of a small group of very wealthy private bankers is doomed to eventual failure.
If you adored this information and you would want to obtain details about I Tip Human Hair Extensions18"20"22"24" 100g Malaysian Virgin Hair Stick I Tip Human Hair Extensions Cabelo Humano Tic Tac i implore you to go to our internet site.
subtle red highlights